Physics · 1964

On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox

John S. Bell

CERN

Cited by 12,000+Open access
View original paper

Opens the version of record via DOI


Bell turned the EPR debate from philosophy into experiment. He proved that any theory based on local hidden variables must obey an inequality that quantum mechanics violates — making the question of non-locality empirically decidable.

Made entanglement testable; later experiments confirmed quantum non-locality.

A theorem-and-proof argument. Bell modelled correlated measurements on entangled particles under the assumption of locality and hidden variables, then derived a statistical inequality and compared it with the quantum prediction.

Keywords

Physics

Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?

Einstein, Podolsky & Rosen · 1935 · Physical Review

The 'EPR paradox' argued that quantum mechanics, if taken as complete, implies a spooky instantaneous link between distant particles. Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen used this to claim the theory must be incomplete — that hidden variables underlie its probabilities.

Cited by 15,000+Open access

Physics

Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

Abbott et al. · 2016 · Physical Review Letters

The first direct detection of gravitational waves, a century after Einstein predicted them. On 14 September 2015 the two LIGO detectors recorded the spacetime ripple (event GW150914) from two black holes spiralling together and merging over a billion light-years away.

Cited by 15,000+Open access

Physics

Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons

Higgs · 1964 · Physical Review Letters

Higgs showed how gauge bosons — the carriers of fundamental forces — can acquire mass through spontaneous symmetry breaking without spoiling the underlying gauge symmetry. The mechanism predicts a new scalar field and its associated particle.

Cited by 5,000+Open access

Étude Science indexes and summarises this work; it is not the publisher. The summary above is written by Étude. For the definitive text, figures, and data, please consult the original publication via the link above. Bell (1964) hold the rights to the original work.