Physics · 1935

Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?

Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, Nathan Rosen

Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton

Cited by 15,000+Open access
View original paper

Opens the version of record via DOI


The 'EPR paradox' argued that quantum mechanics, if taken as complete, implies a spooky instantaneous link between distant particles. Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen used this to claim the theory must be incomplete — that hidden variables underlie its probabilities.

Framed the entanglement debate that became the foundation of quantum information science.

A purely theoretical gedanken-experiment using a two-particle wavefunction with correlated positions and momenta, combined with a philosophical criterion for when a physical quantity counts as objectively real.

Keywords

Physics

On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox

Bell · 1964 · Physics Physique Физика

Bell turned the EPR debate from philosophy into experiment. He proved that any theory based on local hidden variables must obey an inequality that quantum mechanics violates — making the question of non-locality empirically decidable.

Cited by 12,000+Open access

Physics

Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

Abbott et al. · 2016 · Physical Review Letters

The first direct detection of gravitational waves, a century after Einstein predicted them. On 14 September 2015 the two LIGO detectors recorded the spacetime ripple (event GW150914) from two black holes spiralling together and merging over a billion light-years away.

Cited by 15,000+Open access

Physics

Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons

Higgs · 1964 · Physical Review Letters

Higgs showed how gauge bosons — the carriers of fundamental forces — can acquire mass through spontaneous symmetry breaking without spoiling the underlying gauge symmetry. The mechanism predicts a new scalar field and its associated particle.

Cited by 5,000+Open access

Étude Science indexes and summarises this work; it is not the publisher. The summary above is written by Étude. For the definitive text, figures, and data, please consult the original publication via the link above. Einstein, Podolsky & Rosen (1935) hold the rights to the original work.